Potential Errors Resulting from Sex and Age Difference in Assessing Family History of Diabetes

Background. Diabetes mellitus occurs nearly exponentially with aging and its occurrence differs between men and women in adulthood. Therefore, the sex and age of family members should be considered in assessing the family history. In this report the effects of sex and age on the positivity of family...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 1999-01, Vol.28 (1), p.33-39
Hauptverfasser: Saito, T., Furukawa, T., Nanri, S., Saito, I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Diabetes mellitus occurs nearly exponentially with aging and its occurrence differs between men and women in adulthood. Therefore, the sex and age of family members should be considered in assessing the family history. In this report the effects of sex and age on the positivity of family history were estimated numerically. Methods. Sex- and age-specific proportion of a positive history of diabetes mellitus among 24,273 family members was obtained from a questionnaire survey of 2,316 high school students in Japan. By analyzing the sex- and age-specific proportion with the logistic regression model, odds ratios were estimated which indicated potential bias or misclassification resulting from sex and age differences. Results. The odds ratios were 1.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.74–2.23) for the sex difference and 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.05) for an age difference of 1 year. This indicated that a male family member had a 1.97 times higher chance of having a positive history than a female member and that a positive history increased by (1.05)y, whereywas age difference in years. Conclusion. A control for sex and age of family members will be required in assessing the family history of diabetes mellitus as a risk factor.
ISSN:0091-7435
1096-0260
DOI:10.1006/pmed.1998.0371