Review of the granulosa-theca cell tumors from the Emil Novak Ovarian Tumor Registry

Objective: Our purpose was to review patients with granulosa and theca cell tumors as filed in the Emil Novak Ovarian Tumor Registry. Study Design: Our study was a descriptive, retrospective study of 454 case records. Results: The reviewed diagnoses were for 97 patients with granulosa cell tumors, 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1999-02, Vol.180 (2), p.323-327
Hauptverfasser: Cronjé, Hendrik S., Niemand, Illse, Bam, Roosmarie H., Woodruff, J.Donald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Our purpose was to review patients with granulosa and theca cell tumors as filed in the Emil Novak Ovarian Tumor Registry. Study Design: Our study was a descriptive, retrospective study of 454 case records. Results: The reviewed diagnoses were for 97 patients with granulosa cell tumors, 116 with theca cell tumors, and 97 with granulosa-theca cell tumors. The remaining cases (n = 144) were reclassified as “nonspecific” gonadal stromal tumors (n = 61), luteomas of pregnancy (n = 7), and 76 “other” cases. These included poorly differentiated cancer, metastatic cancer, mixed mesodermal tumors, and sarcomas. The tumor-related mortality rate for the 310 patients with granulosa, theca, and granulosa-theca cell tumors was 7% (37.3% for granulosa cell tumors only). The surgical stage of disease was the most significant prognostic factor, with a mortality rate of at least 40%, given that the tumor had spread beyond the ovary. Conclusion: Because the differential diagnoses of particularly granulosa cell tumors included several conditions with an extremely poor prognosis, an accurate histologic diagnosis is crucial. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:323-7.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70207-3