Telephone Validation of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory‐89 (QOLIE‐89)

Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory‐89 (QOLIE‐89) administered via telephone and to compare these properties with data gathered through self‐administration. Methods: A study of 139 patients with epilepsy was undertaken at three clinical sites i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) 1999-01, Vol.40 (1), p.97-106
Hauptverfasser: Leidy, Nancy Kline, Elixhauser, Anne, Rentz, Anne M., Beach, Robert, Pellock, John, Schachter, Steven, Willian, Mary Kay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory‐89 (QOLIE‐89) administered via telephone and to compare these properties with data gathered through self‐administration. Methods: A study of 139 patients with epilepsy was undertaken at three clinical sites in the United States. Patients participated in both telephone interview (T) and self‐administration (S). Order effect was controlled through randomization (T‐S and S‐T). Twenty‐eight S‐T subjects participated in an assessment of the 2‐week reproducibility of telephone interviews. Results: Internal consistency and test‐retest reliability levels of the QOLIE‐89 overall score were very high across method of administration (T = 0.98; S = 0.98; ICC of T = 0.96). Scores were significantly related to mood (Profile of Mood States, r= ‐0.76, for both methods, p > 0.001) and two indicators of epilepsy severity (seizure frequency in the past month, T: r= 0.52, p > 0.0001; S: r= 0.54, p > 0.0001; days since last seizure, T: r= 0.28, p > 0.001; S: r= 0.25, p > 0.01), with no significant differences in coefficients by method of administration. Performance of the measure was consistent for patients with unimpaired and impaired memory, using the River‐mead Behavioural Memory Test, and across level of education. Conclusions: Results of this study indicate telephone interview is a viable option for evaluating HRQL in persons with epilepsy and support the reliability and validity of the QOLIE‐89 regardless of method of administration.
ISSN:0013-9580
1528-1167
DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb01995.x