Angioscopic Comparison of Neointimal Coverage Between Zotarolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated reduced late loss (LL) and low target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates through an inhibitory effect on neointimal hyperplasia but might have a risk of late or very late stent thrombosis due to incomplete neointimal coverage (NIC) (1-3). Considering the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008-08, Vol.52 (9), p.789-790 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated reduced late loss (LL) and low target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates through an inhibitory effect on neointimal hyperplasia but might have a risk of late or very late stent thrombosis due to incomplete neointimal coverage (NIC) (1-3). Considering the risk of stent thrombosis due to incomplete NIC, it is preferable for DES to have sufficient neointimal volume no greater than LL of 0.65 mm. Although the single-center, nonrandomized, matched-control, and observational nature with a small sample size of this study should be noted as a limitation, this study suggests that arterial endothelial healing after stenting is more competent in ZES than in SES. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.007 |