Angioscopic Comparison of Neointimal Coverage Between Zotarolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated reduced late loss (LL) and low target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates through an inhibitory effect on neointimal hyperplasia but might have a risk of late or very late stent thrombosis due to incomplete neointimal coverage (NIC) (1-3). Considering the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008-08, Vol.52 (9), p.789-790
Hauptverfasser: Awata, Masaki, MD, Nanto, Shinsuke, MD, PhD, FACC, Uematsu, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FACC, Morozumi, Takakazu, MD, PhD, Watanabe, Tetsuya, MD, PhD, Onishi, Toshinari, MD, Iida, Osamu, MD, Sera, Fusako, MD, Kotani, Jun-ichi, MD, PhD, FACC, Hori, Masatsugu, MD, PhD, FACC, Nagata, Seiki, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated reduced late loss (LL) and low target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates through an inhibitory effect on neointimal hyperplasia but might have a risk of late or very late stent thrombosis due to incomplete neointimal coverage (NIC) (1-3). Considering the risk of stent thrombosis due to incomplete NIC, it is preferable for DES to have sufficient neointimal volume no greater than LL of 0.65 mm. Although the single-center, nonrandomized, matched-control, and observational nature with a small sample size of this study should be noted as a limitation, this study suggests that arterial endothelial healing after stenting is more competent in ZES than in SES.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.007