Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study
Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2008-05, Vol.36 (4), p.312-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 312 |
container_title | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Kumar, Rajesh S De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia Ong, Poh Yan Goldberg, Ivan |
description | Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3‐h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Twenty‐five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.7 years (50–82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 ± 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 ± 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 ± 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 ± 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = −0.0789).
Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69428000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19715695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d230f4a664dce219c41a87307e525f2944e07b03f8dfc0dace82ff6d091b43283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQjRCIfsBfQD5xS-qv2M4BoWpbCqJqJVSExMXy2hPkXW8S7ITu_nscsipHmMuMNO89e94rCkRwRXJdbCrCOS0bLElFMVYVJlLU1f5Zcfq0eH6cBcf8pDhLaYMxrikTL4sToiTGDRGnxfaqh4QGMFvkuzGa3k7BRDRESGmKgHZg5u7Q-oAezQgRuei7re9-oBHSiCK0Aey4KFgfrXHedCjALwjpPbpEgw_9iNI4ucOr4kVrQoLXx35efP1w_bD6WN7e33xaXd6WljNRl44y3HIjBHcWKGksJ0ZJhiXUtG5pwzlgucasVa612BkLiratcPmgNWdUsfPi7aI7xP7nlH-pdz5ZCMF00E9Ji4ZTlc34J5A0ktSiqTNQLUAb-5TyzXqIfmfiQROs50T0Rs9m69l4PSei_ySi95n65vjGtN6B-0s8RpAB7xbAow9w-G9hvbq-n6fMLxe-TyPsn_gmbrWQTNb6292N_kykuvvSPOjv7DfeNanL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19715695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Kumar, Rajesh S ; De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia ; Ong, Poh Yan ; Goldberg, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh S ; De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia ; Ong, Poh Yan ; Goldberg, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3‐h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Twenty‐five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.7 years (50–82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 ± 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 ± 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 ± 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 ± 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = −0.0789).
Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18700916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Circadian Rhythm ; Drinking ; Female ; Glaucoma - pathology ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology ; Optic Disk - pathology ; Pilot Projects ; Time Factors ; Tonometry, Ocular ; water drinking</subject><ispartof>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2008-05, Vol.36 (4), p.312-315</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d230f4a664dce219c41a87307e525f2944e07b03f8dfc0dace82ff6d091b43283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d230f4a664dce219c41a87307e525f2944e07b03f8dfc0dace82ff6d091b43283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2008.01765.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2008.01765.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18700916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Poh Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study</title><title>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3‐h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Twenty‐five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.7 years (50–82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 ± 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 ± 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 ± 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 ± 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = −0.0789).
Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Drinking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - pathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Optic Disk - pathology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular</subject><subject>water drinking</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQjRCIfsBfQD5xS-qv2M4BoWpbCqJqJVSExMXy2hPkXW8S7ITu_nscsipHmMuMNO89e94rCkRwRXJdbCrCOS0bLElFMVYVJlLU1f5Zcfq0eH6cBcf8pDhLaYMxrikTL4sToiTGDRGnxfaqh4QGMFvkuzGa3k7BRDRESGmKgHZg5u7Q-oAezQgRuei7re9-oBHSiCK0Aey4KFgfrXHedCjALwjpPbpEgw_9iNI4ucOr4kVrQoLXx35efP1w_bD6WN7e33xaXd6WljNRl44y3HIjBHcWKGksJ0ZJhiXUtG5pwzlgucasVa612BkLiratcPmgNWdUsfPi7aI7xP7nlH-pdz5ZCMF00E9Ji4ZTlc34J5A0ktSiqTNQLUAb-5TyzXqIfmfiQROs50T0Rs9m69l4PSei_ySi95n65vjGtN6B-0s8RpAB7xbAow9w-G9hvbq-n6fMLxe-TyPsn_gmbrWQTNb6292N_kykuvvSPOjv7DfeNanL</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>Kumar, Rajesh S</creator><creator>De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia</creator><creator>Ong, Poh Yan</creator><creator>Goldberg, Ivan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study</title><author>Kumar, Rajesh S ; De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia ; Ong, Poh Yan ; Goldberg, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d230f4a664dce219c41a87307e525f2944e07b03f8dfc0dace82ff6d091b43283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Drinking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - pathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Optic Disk - pathology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular</topic><topic>water drinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Poh Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Rajesh S</au><au>De Guzman, Maria Hannah Pia</au><au>Ong, Poh Yan</au><au>Goldberg, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>312-315</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3‐h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Twenty‐five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.7 years (50–82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 ± 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 ± 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 ± 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 ± 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = −0.0789).
Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>18700916</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-6404 |
ispartof | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2008-05, Vol.36 (4), p.312-315 |
issn | 1442-6404 1442-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69428000 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Circadian Rhythm Drinking Female Glaucoma - pathology Glaucoma - physiopathology Glaucoma, Open-Angle - physiopathology Humans Intraocular Pressure Male Middle Aged Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology Optic Disk - pathology Pilot Projects Time Factors Tonometry, Ocular water drinking |
title | Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20peak%20intraocular%20pressure%20measured%20by%20water%20drinking%20test%20reflect%20peak%20circadian%20levels?%20A%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Kumar,%20Rajesh%20S&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=312-315&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19715695%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19715695&rft_id=info:pmid/18700916&rfr_iscdi=true |