Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study
Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2008-05, Vol.36 (4), p.312-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma‐like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3‐h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Twenty‐five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 ± 8.7 years (50–82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 ± 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 ± 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 ± 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 ± 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = −0.0789).
Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1442-6404 1442-9071 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x |