Anterior capsule cover and axial movement of intraocular lens
Purpose To measure optic shift (OS) of a single piece monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with varying relationships between anterior capsule cover and IOL optic. Methods This is a prospective randomized masked study of 150 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification. Eyes received either option: 360 o total c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2008-08, Vol.22 (8), p.1015-1023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To measure optic shift (OS) of a single piece monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with varying relationships between anterior capsule cover and IOL optic.
Methods
This is a prospective randomized masked study of 150 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification. Eyes received either option: 360
o
total capsule cover (group I); partial cover (group II); or no cover (group III). OS was calculated as difference in anterior chamber depth after administration of cyclopentolate 1% and pilocarpine 2% on IOLMaster
®
at separate visits at 6 months follow-up. Subsequently, using retro-illumination photographs, percentage area of capsule cover was calculated. OS within and between groups I and II was analyzed. The impact of one quartile change in area of capsule cover on percentage change in OS was measured for both groups. Unpaired
t
-test, correlation, and regression were applied.
Results
In groups I, II, and III, mean age of patients was 56.68±6.38, 57.09±7.34, 59.15±6.35 years, respectively; mean OS (mm) was 1.25±0.28, 1.20±0.24; 0.95±0.26 (
P
=0.013), respectively; and percentage area of capsule cover (%) was 47.35±10.48, 33.83±10.11, 0.16±0.13 (
P
=0.001), respectively. Mean percentage area of capsule cover in group I
vs
group II was significant (
P
=0.001). OS was 1.22±0.26 mm in groups I and II (combined)
vs
0.95±0.26 mm in group III (
P
=0.004, (0.06, 0.33)). OS in group I
vs
group II was not significant (
P
=0.46). Correlation coefficient was
r
=0.38 (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.eye.6702817 |