In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays

We investigated retailer compliance with point-of-sale display legislation, using a New Zealand region as a case study. An observational survey was conducted of nonspecialist tobacco retailers in the lower North Island of New Zealand during 2006. Compliance was assessed in relation to store type (da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nicotine & tobacco research 2008-08, Vol.10 (8), p.1347-1354
Hauptverfasser: Quedley, Megan, Ng, Brendan, Sapre, Nikhil, Blakiston, Matthew, Crawford, Alexandra, Devadas, Rosanne, McLaren, Hamish, Anand, Shruti, Tipu, Mahu, Dayal, Viswas, Chandrasiri, Singithi, Thomson, George, Edwards, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1354
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1347
container_title Nicotine & tobacco research
container_volume 10
creator Quedley, Megan
Ng, Brendan
Sapre, Nikhil
Blakiston, Matthew
Crawford, Alexandra
Devadas, Rosanne
McLaren, Hamish
Anand, Shruti
Tipu, Mahu
Dayal, Viswas
Chandrasiri, Singithi
Thomson, George
Edwards, Richard
description We investigated retailer compliance with point-of-sale display legislation, using a New Zealand region as a case study. An observational survey was conducted of nonspecialist tobacco retailers in the lower North Island of New Zealand during 2006. Compliance was assessed in relation to store type (dairies, convenience stores, supermarkets, and service stations) and by characteristics of the population of the census area unit in which the store was situated. These characteristics include the level of socioeconomic deprivation and proportions of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), Pacific Islanders, and children aged less than 19 years. Out of the 288 stores surveyed, 185 (64%) had at least one breach of the point-of-sale regulations. The most common breaches were a failure to display a "Smoking Kills" sign, visibility of tobacco from outside the premises, and displaying tobacco less than 1 m from children's products. Compliance was significantly worse in dairies (small local general stores) and convenience stores. Stores situated in areas in the top quartile for the proportion of children were much more likely to have high levels of noncompliance (⩾3 breaches) and to display tobacco products close to children's products. This study is one of very few to systematically investigate retailer compliance with point-of-sale display regulations for tobacco products. The results suggest that the implementation of legislation to partly limit retail displays of tobacco products can be difficult. A ban on retail displays of tobacco products is likely to be a more effective and enforceable policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14622200802238860
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69401630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26762695</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26762695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-fc2c195c65d470bc9fcc40aa1162560a5c64e9a459534ad67bad42c0115e8f073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9LxDAQxYMorq5-AA9KTp6sZtI0bb3J4p-FBUEUBA8lTdPdLGlTkyyy3964u-hBGJhh5vcew0PoDMg1kILcAOOUUhJHStOi4GQPHcVdmZQle9_fzDSJQDpCx94vCaEABRyiERS84FDQI_Qx7bHX80W4wrrHne6bW_yigtBGOSxtNxgteqnwlw4LbNRceyOCtj2OZXSng-7n2G0EONhaSGlxo_1gxNqfoINWGK9Od32M3h7uXydPyez5cTq5myUypRCSVlIJZSZ51rCc1LJspWRECABOM05EvDBVCpaVWcpEw_NaNIxKApCpoiV5OkaXW9_B2c-V8qHqtJfKGNEru_IVLxkBnpIIwhaUznrvVFsNTnfCrSsg1U-i1b9Eo-ZiZ76qO9X8KXYRRuB8Cyx9sO73TnnOKY8vfwM9SHpp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69401630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Quedley, Megan ; Ng, Brendan ; Sapre, Nikhil ; Blakiston, Matthew ; Crawford, Alexandra ; Devadas, Rosanne ; McLaren, Hamish ; Anand, Shruti ; Tipu, Mahu ; Dayal, Viswas ; Chandrasiri, Singithi ; Thomson, George ; Edwards, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Quedley, Megan ; Ng, Brendan ; Sapre, Nikhil ; Blakiston, Matthew ; Crawford, Alexandra ; Devadas, Rosanne ; McLaren, Hamish ; Anand, Shruti ; Tipu, Mahu ; Dayal, Viswas ; Chandrasiri, Singithi ; Thomson, George ; Edwards, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated retailer compliance with point-of-sale display legislation, using a New Zealand region as a case study. An observational survey was conducted of nonspecialist tobacco retailers in the lower North Island of New Zealand during 2006. Compliance was assessed in relation to store type (dairies, convenience stores, supermarkets, and service stations) and by characteristics of the population of the census area unit in which the store was situated. These characteristics include the level of socioeconomic deprivation and proportions of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), Pacific Islanders, and children aged less than 19 years. Out of the 288 stores surveyed, 185 (64%) had at least one breach of the point-of-sale regulations. The most common breaches were a failure to display a "Smoking Kills" sign, visibility of tobacco from outside the premises, and displaying tobacco less than 1 m from children's products. Compliance was significantly worse in dairies (small local general stores) and convenience stores. Stores situated in areas in the top quartile for the proportion of children were much more likely to have high levels of noncompliance (⩾3 breaches) and to display tobacco products close to children's products. This study is one of very few to systematically investigate retailer compliance with point-of-sale display regulations for tobacco products. The results suggest that the implementation of legislation to partly limit retail displays of tobacco products can be difficult. A ban on retail displays of tobacco products is likely to be a more effective and enforceable policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-994X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14622200802238860</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18686182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adolescent ; Adult ; Advertising as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence ; Advertising as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Child ; Child Welfare - legislation & jurisprudence ; Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data ; Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence ; Commerce - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Government Regulation ; Humans ; Male ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Public Policy ; Residence Characteristics ; Smoking - legislation & jurisprudence ; Smoking Prevention ; Social Facilitation ; Social Responsibility ; Tobacco Industry - legislation & jurisprudence ; Young Adult]]></subject><ispartof>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research, 2008-08, Vol.10 (8), p.1347-1354</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-fc2c195c65d470bc9fcc40aa1162560a5c64e9a459534ad67bad42c0115e8f073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26762695$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26762695$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18686182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quedley, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapre, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blakiston, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devadas, Rosanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipu, Mahu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayal, Viswas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasiri, Singithi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays</title><title>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</title><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><description>We investigated retailer compliance with point-of-sale display legislation, using a New Zealand region as a case study. An observational survey was conducted of nonspecialist tobacco retailers in the lower North Island of New Zealand during 2006. Compliance was assessed in relation to store type (dairies, convenience stores, supermarkets, and service stations) and by characteristics of the population of the census area unit in which the store was situated. These characteristics include the level of socioeconomic deprivation and proportions of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), Pacific Islanders, and children aged less than 19 years. Out of the 288 stores surveyed, 185 (64%) had at least one breach of the point-of-sale regulations. The most common breaches were a failure to display a "Smoking Kills" sign, visibility of tobacco from outside the premises, and displaying tobacco less than 1 m from children's products. Compliance was significantly worse in dairies (small local general stores) and convenience stores. Stores situated in areas in the top quartile for the proportion of children were much more likely to have high levels of noncompliance (⩾3 breaches) and to display tobacco products close to children's products. This study is one of very few to systematically investigate retailer compliance with point-of-sale display regulations for tobacco products. The results suggest that the implementation of legislation to partly limit retail displays of tobacco products can be difficult. A ban on retail displays of tobacco products is likely to be a more effective and enforceable policy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Welfare - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Commerce - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Smoking - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Social Facilitation</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1462-2203</issn><issn>1469-994X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE9LxDAQxYMorq5-AA9KTp6sZtI0bb3J4p-FBUEUBA8lTdPdLGlTkyyy3964u-hBGJhh5vcew0PoDMg1kILcAOOUUhJHStOi4GQPHcVdmZQle9_fzDSJQDpCx94vCaEABRyiERS84FDQI_Qx7bHX80W4wrrHne6bW_yigtBGOSxtNxgteqnwlw4LbNRceyOCtj2OZXSng-7n2G0EONhaSGlxo_1gxNqfoINWGK9Od32M3h7uXydPyez5cTq5myUypRCSVlIJZSZ51rCc1LJspWRECABOM05EvDBVCpaVWcpEw_NaNIxKApCpoiV5OkaXW9_B2c-V8qHqtJfKGNEru_IVLxkBnpIIwhaUznrvVFsNTnfCrSsg1U-i1b9Eo-ZiZ76qO9X8KXYRRuB8Cyx9sO73TnnOKY8vfwM9SHpp</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Quedley, Megan</creator><creator>Ng, Brendan</creator><creator>Sapre, Nikhil</creator><creator>Blakiston, Matthew</creator><creator>Crawford, Alexandra</creator><creator>Devadas, Rosanne</creator><creator>McLaren, Hamish</creator><creator>Anand, Shruti</creator><creator>Tipu, Mahu</creator><creator>Dayal, Viswas</creator><creator>Chandrasiri, Singithi</creator><creator>Thomson, George</creator><creator>Edwards, Richard</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays</title><author>Quedley, Megan ; Ng, Brendan ; Sapre, Nikhil ; Blakiston, Matthew ; Crawford, Alexandra ; Devadas, Rosanne ; McLaren, Hamish ; Anand, Shruti ; Tipu, Mahu ; Dayal, Viswas ; Chandrasiri, Singithi ; Thomson, George ; Edwards, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-fc2c195c65d470bc9fcc40aa1162560a5c64e9a459534ad67bad42c0115e8f073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Welfare - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Commerce - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Smoking - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Social Facilitation</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quedley, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapre, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blakiston, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devadas, Rosanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipu, Mahu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayal, Viswas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasiri, Singithi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quedley, Megan</au><au>Ng, Brendan</au><au>Sapre, Nikhil</au><au>Blakiston, Matthew</au><au>Crawford, Alexandra</au><au>Devadas, Rosanne</au><au>McLaren, Hamish</au><au>Anand, Shruti</au><au>Tipu, Mahu</au><au>Dayal, Viswas</au><au>Chandrasiri, Singithi</au><au>Thomson, George</au><au>Edwards, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays</atitle><jtitle>Nicotine &amp; tobacco research</jtitle><addtitle>Nicotine Tob Res</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1347</spage><epage>1354</epage><pages>1347-1354</pages><issn>1462-2203</issn><eissn>1469-994X</eissn><abstract>We investigated retailer compliance with point-of-sale display legislation, using a New Zealand region as a case study. An observational survey was conducted of nonspecialist tobacco retailers in the lower North Island of New Zealand during 2006. Compliance was assessed in relation to store type (dairies, convenience stores, supermarkets, and service stations) and by characteristics of the population of the census area unit in which the store was situated. These characteristics include the level of socioeconomic deprivation and proportions of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), Pacific Islanders, and children aged less than 19 years. Out of the 288 stores surveyed, 185 (64%) had at least one breach of the point-of-sale regulations. The most common breaches were a failure to display a "Smoking Kills" sign, visibility of tobacco from outside the premises, and displaying tobacco less than 1 m from children's products. Compliance was significantly worse in dairies (small local general stores) and convenience stores. Stores situated in areas in the top quartile for the proportion of children were much more likely to have high levels of noncompliance (⩾3 breaches) and to display tobacco products close to children's products. This study is one of very few to systematically investigate retailer compliance with point-of-sale display regulations for tobacco products. The results suggest that the implementation of legislation to partly limit retail displays of tobacco products can be difficult. A ban on retail displays of tobacco products is likely to be a more effective and enforceable policy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>18686182</pmid><doi>10.1080/14622200802238860</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-2203
ispartof Nicotine & tobacco research, 2008-08, Vol.10 (8), p.1347-1354
issn 1462-2203
1469-994X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69401630
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Oxford Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Advertising as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence
Advertising as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Child
Child Welfare - legislation & jurisprudence
Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data
Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence
Commerce - statistics & numerical data
Female
Government Regulation
Humans
Male
New Zealand - epidemiology
Public Policy
Residence Characteristics
Smoking - legislation & jurisprudence
Smoking Prevention
Social Facilitation
Social Responsibility
Tobacco Industry - legislation & jurisprudence
Young Adult
title In sight, in mind: Retailer compliance with legislation on limiting retail tobacco displays
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T19%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20sight,%20in%20mind:%20Retailer%20compliance%20with%20legislation%20on%20limiting%20retail%20tobacco%20displays&rft.jtitle=Nicotine%20&%20tobacco%20research&rft.au=Quedley,%20Megan&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1347&rft.epage=1354&rft.pages=1347-1354&rft.issn=1462-2203&rft.eissn=1469-994X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14622200802238860&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26762695%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69401630&rft_id=info:pmid/18686182&rft_jstor_id=26762695&rfr_iscdi=true