Do immunoassays differentially detect different acidity glycoforms of FSH?

OBJECTIVE The possibility of the carbohydrate residues of glycoproteins affecting their recognition in immunoassays is an important and unresolved issue. This study looked for evidence of differential recognition of FSH glycoform preparations, of variable isoelectric point (pI) and known molarity, u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 1999-12, Vol.51 (6), p.681-686
Hauptverfasser: Oliver, Robert L., Kane, John W., Waite, Annelise, Mulders, John W. M., Robertson, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE The possibility of the carbohydrate residues of glycoproteins affecting their recognition in immunoassays is an important and unresolved issue. This study looked for evidence of differential recognition of FSH glycoform preparations, of variable isoelectric point (pI) and known molarity, using three routine assays employing different antibody configurations. DESIGN Seven glycoform preparations with differing pI bands (between 3.8 and 5.5) were produced by isoelectric focusing of recombinant human FSH and the molecular weights determined by mass spectroscopy. Three concentrations of each glycoform were assayed and the results expressed relative to unfractionated material. From the relative responses, recognition differences between the assay methods and between the glycoform preparations were investigated. MEASUREMENTS Three routine assays were employed: the commercially available Amerlite® enzyme immunoassay and Delfia® immunofluorometric assay, together with an in‐house competitive two‐site radioimmunoassay (RIA). RESULTS Overall, the three assays gave the same relative responses for equivalent glycoforms, with the only exceptions involving small differences between some assay pairs for the fractions at the extremes of the pI range investigated. Within each assay type, differences (P 
ISSN:0300-0664
1365-2265
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00823.x