Etiology, pathophysiology, treatment choices, and voice results for unilateral adductor vocal fold paralysis: A 3-year retrospective

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis is now considered a common disorder seen in the practice of otolaryngology and voice pathology. Concern first is for the accurate diagnosis of the associated etiology in an efficient and thorough fashion. When etiology has been determined the focus of treatment become...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 1999-12, Vol.13 (4), p.592-601
Hauptverfasser: Kelchner, Lisa N., Stemple, Joseph C., Gerdeman, Bernice, Le Borgne, Wendy, Adam, Stewart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Unilateral vocal fold paralysis is now considered a common disorder seen in the practice of otolaryngology and voice pathology. Concern first is for the accurate diagnosis of the associated etiology in an efficient and thorough fashion. When etiology has been determined the focus of treatment becomes the management of the presenting symptoms, which typically include dysphonia and dysphagia. A retrospective study was conducted reviewing the records of 117 patients with unilateral adductor vocal fold paralysis who presented to a large otolaryngology practice and clinical voice lab from 1995 to 1998. Demographic data reveal most patients to range in age from 16 to 91 with a dominant clustering for ages 50 to 70. Gender distribution reveals males slightly exceed females in this sample. Data regarding etiology type are collected in great detail, revealing that disease and surgery involving the chest contribute the greatest to the overall number in this study and that anterior approach to cervical spine surgery contributes as much as thyroid surgery. General outcomes of the patients are reviewed. A small group ( n = 25) of patients who had pretreatment and posttreatment data available revealed statistically significant differences between voice outcomes for patients who were treated with medialization and for those treated with therapy. Patients receiving therapy had less severe symptoms pretreatment, while greater gains pretreatment to posttreatment were shown for those who had surgical medialization.
ISSN:0892-1997
1873-4588
DOI:10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80013-7