Impact of Culprit Plaque Composition on the No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Analysis

Background The difference in the culprit plaque composition of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with and without the no-reflow phenomenon has not been fully evaluated. Methods and Results Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data of culprit plaques were obtained and analyzed in 49 ACS patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2008, Vol.72(8), pp.1235-1241
Hauptverfasser: Higashikuni, Yasutomi, Tanabe, Kengo, Tanimoto, Shuzou, Aoki, Jiro, Yamamoto, Hirosada, Nakazawa, Gaku, Chihara, Ruri, Onuma, Yoshinobu, Ohtsuki, Shuji, Yagishita, Atsuhiko, Yachi, Sen, Nakajima, Hiroyoshi, Hara, Kazuhiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The difference in the culprit plaque composition of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with and without the no-reflow phenomenon has not been fully evaluated. Methods and Results Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data of culprit plaques were obtained and analyzed in 49 ACS patients. The no-reflow phenomenon was defined as a decrease of at least 1 grade in `Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction' flow immediately after mechanical dilatation compared with before mechanical dilatation, with no evidence of thrombus, spasm, or dissection. The no-reflow phenomenon was observed in 9 individuals. Culprit plaques with the no-reflow phenomenon contained a higher percentage of necrotic core component and a smaller percentage of fibrous component than plaques in the patients without the no-reflow phenomenon (necrotic core component, 22.1±9.3% vs 11.7±7.9%, p=0.0011; fibrous component, 59.6±11.2% vs 68.3±10.2%, p=0.027). Multivariate analysis identified the percentage of necrotic core component as an independent predictor of the no-reflow phenomenon after adjustment for plaque geometry and procedural factors (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.5; p=0.015). Conclusion Culprit plaques of patients with the no-reflow phenomenon differ from those in patients without the no-reflow phenomenon. (Circ J 2008; 72: 1235 - 1241)
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.72.1235