Field evaluation of the single intradermal cervical tuberculin test and the interferon-γ assay for detection and eradication of bovine tuberculosis in Spain
A field comparison of the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) assay and the single intradermal cervical tuberculin (SICT) test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis was conducted. A total of 1136 cattle belonging to 85 herds placed in ‘Castilla y León’ (northwestern Spain) were chosen, and 21 of these herds wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary microbiology 1999-10, Vol.70 (1), p.55-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A field comparison of the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) assay and the single intradermal cervical tuberculin (SICT) test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis was conducted. A total of 1136 cattle belonging to 85 herds placed in ‘Castilla y León’ (northwestern Spain) were chosen, and 21 of these herds were subjected to the diagnostic assays two or three times at intervals of at least 4 months. All the animals positive to any of the tests were slaughtered and tuberculosis was confirmed by culture isolation method (CIM) and further identification by means of PCR. Only 10.6% of cattle reacted with the bovine PPD in the SICT test, a percentage that increased to 12.8% in the IFN-γ assay. The sensitivity of the IFN-γ assay compared to CIM was shown to be higher (84.9%) than that of the SICT test (80.2%), but the combination of both tests offered the highest sensitivity (92.9%). The number of false positive reactors (those animals in which CIM was negative) was considerably higher for the IFN-γ assay than for the SICT test and, conversely, the number of false negative animals (
M. bovis isolation but negative immunological result) was higher for the skin test than for the interferon assay. In the herds tested twice, tuberculosis was eradicated after the second cycle of testing in 50%, and in 75% after the third cycle in herds tested three times. The combination of these two techniques instead of separately seems, therefore, to be useful in eradication programmes against bovine tuberculosis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1135 1873-2542 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00121-2 |