Comparability of results from two leakage models

Objective The goal of this study was to check whether leakage results of the same specimens measured by 2 different leakage models are similar. Study design Canine root canals were prepared and filled with cold gutta-percha cones and 1 of 4 sealers (20 canals for each sealer). The 80 specimens were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2008-08, Vol.106 (2), p.309-313
Hauptverfasser: Souza, Erick Miranda, MSc, Wu, Min-Kai, MD, MSD, PhD, Shemesh, Hagay, DMD, Bonetti-Filho, Idomeo, PhD, Wesselink, Paul R., DDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The goal of this study was to check whether leakage results of the same specimens measured by 2 different leakage models are similar. Study design Canine root canals were prepared and filled with cold gutta-percha cones and 1 of 4 sealers (20 canals for each sealer). The 80 specimens were first connected to a fluid transport model where air-bubble movement was measured. The same specimens were later connected to a glucose penetration model where the concentration of glucose was measured. In both models, a headspace pressure of 30 kPa was used to accelerate leakage. Results In both models, 4 sealers ranked the same regarding the leakage they allowed, and a significant correlation between the results of the 2 models was confined (Spearman test coefficient = 0.65; P = .000001). Conclusion Under the conditions of this study, leakage results of 80 specimens recorded in the fluid transport model and glucose penetration model were similar.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.025