Left atrial systolic function is depressed in idiopathic and preserved in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Background Left atrial systolic dysfunction, unexplained by altered loading conditions, has been reported in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy suggesting left atrial involvement in the myopathic process. Materials and methods Seventeen patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 16 with ischemi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical investigation 1999-11, Vol.29 (11), p.905-912
Hauptverfasser: TRIPOSKIADIS, F, MOYSSAKIS, I, HADJINIKOLAOU, L, MAKRIS, T, ZIORIS, H, HATZIZAHARIAS, A, KYRIAKIDIS, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Left atrial systolic dysfunction, unexplained by altered loading conditions, has been reported in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy suggesting left atrial involvement in the myopathic process. Materials and methods Seventeen patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 16 with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and 18 normal controls were studied with transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Transmitral diastolic flow was evaluated with pulsed Doppler. Left atrial volume (cm3/m2) at mitral valve opening (maximal, Vmax.), onset of atrial systole (P wave of the electrocardiogram, Vp), and mitral valve closure (minimal, Vmin.) was determined with two‐dimensional echocardiography using the biplane area‐length method. The left atrial active emptying fraction (ACTEF = [Vp‐Vmin.] × 100/Vp) served as an index of systolic function. Results The peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (cm/sec) was similar in the three groups (idiopathic: 60 ± 16, ischemic: 58 ± 20, control: 56 ± 22; P = NS), whereas the late diastolic transmitral flow velocity was lower but not significantly different in idiopathic compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy, and in both was lower than control (26 ± 12 vs. 34 ± 13 vs. 44 ± 14, respectively; P 
ISSN:0014-2972
1365-2362
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2362.1999.00563.x