Utilization of Real-Time Ultrasound on Labor and Delivery in an Active Academic Teaching Hospital

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) is currently available on most if not all Labor and Delivery (L+D) services. Our objective was to survey utilization of real-time US on L+D in an active academic teaching hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Between April 1, and July 31, 1998, all US examinations performed for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of perinatology 1999, Vol.16 (6), p.303-307
Hauptverfasser: Sherer, David M., Onyeije, Chukwuma I., Bernstein, Peter S., Kovacs, Peter, Manning, Frank A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) is currently available on most if not all Labor and Delivery (L+D) services. Our objective was to survey utilization of real-time US on L+D in an active academic teaching hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Between April 1, and July 31, 1998, all US examinations performed for clinical purposes on patients presenting to L+D, were documented. Data collected included: gestational age, whether or not the patient was in labor, number of fetuses, and indication for US. All US examinations were performed by OB/GYN housestaff at the PGY 2-3 level, and fellows in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Statistical analysis included Student's t-test and χ 2 when appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered significant throughout. RESULTS: During the 4-month study period, 1316 patients delivered and 1363 were discharged from L+D, not in labor. Of 630 US examinations 31.64% (192 of 630) and 67.69% (418 of 630) were performed in laboring versus nonlaboring patients, respectively. Of all patients delivered during the study period, 14.5% (192 of 1316) underwent intrapartum US, and of all nonlaboring patients, 30.66% (418 of 1363) underwent US on L+D. The mean gestational age at the time of assessment was 37. 32 ± 4.23 weeks' versus 35.74 ± 5.76 weeks' gestation, in laboring versus nonlaboring patients respectively, P < 0.05. Main indications for US in patients in labor were; fetal presentation in patients with spontaneous rupture of membranes (SROM) 34.4% (N = 66), confirmation of vertex presentation 20.3% (N = 39), preterm labor 12% (N = 23), multiple gestation 7.3% (N = 14), and malpresentation 7.3% (N = 14). Main indications for patients not in labor were; amniotic fluid index 15.8% (N = 66), SROM 15.6% (N = 65), postdates 9.8% (N = 41) pla-cental location 9.6% (N = 40), and decreased fetal movement 9.3% (N = 39). Ultrasound-guided interventions included: all deliveries of multiple gestations (N = 9), version in nonlaboring patients (N - 10), and postpartum curettage for retained placental tissue in conjuction with severe early postpartum hemorrhage (N = 2). The incidences of each separate indication for US were significantly different between laboring versus nonlaboring patients, P < 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSION: US examination is performed in 15% of patients in labor and 31% of patients not in labor assessed on L+D, constituting a widely applied diagnostic tool in this environment.
ISSN:0735-1631
1098-8785
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-993876