Improvement of visual function with glare testing after photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a glare source on visual function in patients after photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy. METHODS: Thirteen patients (22 eyes) who underwent photorefractive keratectomy and 20 patients (40 eyes) who underwent radial keratotomy were evaluated in this cr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 1999-11, Vol.128 (5), p.582-587 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSE:
To evaluate the effect of a glare source on visual function in patients after photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy.
METHODS:
Thirteen patients (22 eyes) who underwent photorefractive keratectomy and 20 patients (40 eyes) who underwent radial keratotomy were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. LogMAR visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured. Pupils were measured with the Rosenbaum card. A halogen/tungsten glare source approximated the luminance of headlights of an oncoming car at 100 feet.
RESULTS:
In the photorefractive keratectomy and radial keratotomy groups, pupils were significantly smaller (
P < .01) and the pupillary clearance of the ablation zone in photorefractive keratectomy and the clear zone in radial keratotomy were significantly larger under the glare condition (
P < .01). In the photorefractive keratectomy group, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under the glare condition were significantly higher than in the no-glare condition (
P = .02). In the radial keratotomy group, contrast sensitivity under the glare condition was significantly higher than under the no-glare condition (
P= .001 to .003).
CONCLUSIONS:
After photorefractive keratectomy or radial keratotomy, the traditional glare source constricted the pupil and partially masked the optical aberrations, which resulted in an improvement in visual function. A “pupil-sparing” aberration test is needed for evaluation of visual function after refractive surgery. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00219-6 |