Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations
Nowadays, doctors face an overwhelming amount of information, even in narrow areas of interest. In response, reviews designed to summarize the large volumes of information are frequently published. When a review is done systematically, following certain criteria, and the results are pooled and analy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 2008-06, Vol.75 (6), p.431-439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nowadays, doctors face an overwhelming amount of information, even in narrow areas of interest. In response, reviews designed
to summarize the large volumes of information are frequently published. When a review is done systematically, following certain
criteria, and the results are pooled and analyzed quantitatively, it is called a meta-analysis. A well-designed meta-analysis
can provide valuable information for researchers, policy-makers, and clinicians. However, there are many critical caveats
in performing and interpreting them, and thus many ways in which meta-analyses can yield misleading information.
KEY POINTS
Meta-analysis is an analytical technique designed to summarize the results of multiple studies.
By combining studies, a meta-analysis increases the sample size and thus the power to study effects of interest.
There are many caveats in performing a valid meta-analysis, and in some cases a meta-analysis is not appropriate and the results
can be misleading. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0891-1150 1939-2869 |
DOI: | 10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431 |