A comparison of electrophysiological tests for the early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy
Clinical criteria and several electrophysiological parameters for detecting nerve damage were compared in 99 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2. Abnormal results were found in sural/radial amplitude ratio (51%), minimal F‐wave latency of the tibial nerve (36.4%), sensory conduction ve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Muscle & nerve 1999-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1667-1673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clinical criteria and several electrophysiological parameters for detecting nerve damage were compared in 99 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2. Abnormal results were found in sural/radial amplitude ratio (51%), minimal F‐wave latency of the tibial nerve (36.4%), sensory conduction velocity of the sural nerve (29.8%), and sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude (29.3%) when pooling data from all patients and comparing them to age‐ and height‐matched normal control subjects. Analysis of all the parameters revealed large differences between the diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 groups, suggesting that the type of diabetes must be taken into account when comparing the sensitivity of nerve conduction tests. In diabetes mellitus type 1, the sural/radial ratio had the clearest correlation with course of illness and was the first parameter to show a significant reduction. We conclude that the simple ratio between sural and radial amplitudes is a very sensitive parameter and abnormalities in this ratio provide the means for earliest detection of neuropathy in diabetes mellitus type 1. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 22: 1667–1673, 1999 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199912)22:12<1667::AID-MUS8>3.0.CO;2-W |