Screening and Caring for Children with Rare Disorders

Critics who argue that newborn screening may take resources away from other programs that might benefit more children tacitly accept the reprehensible behavior of state policy-makers and condone injustice when they cite examples like a states diversion of Medicaid funds from prenatal care or asthma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Hastings Center report 2008-05, Vol.38 (3), p.3-3
Hauptverfasser:	LIN, BRUCE K., FLEISCHMAN, ALAN R.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Babies Bioethics Clinical medicine Clinical trials Diagnosis Diseases Genetic Diseases, Inborn - diagnosis Genetic disorders Humans Infant, Newborn Infants (Newborn) Medical examination Medical screening Neonatal diseases Neonatal screening Neonatal Screening - ethics Prevention Program Development Public health Rare diseases Rare Diseases - diagnosis Resource Allocation - ethics Risk factors Social Justice United States
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Critics who argue that newborn screening may take resources away from other programs that might benefit more children tacitly accept the reprehensible behavior of state policy-makers and condone injustice when they cite examples like a states diversion of Medicaid funds from prenatal care or asthma prevention to support newborn screening.
ISSN:	0093-0334 1552-146X 1552-146X
DOI:	10.1353/hcr.0.0006