Stigma, ethics and policy: A commentary on Bayer's “Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we”
Comments are offered on Ronald Bayer's (2008) analysis of stigma & the ethics of public health, challenging his contention that stigma is a matter of degree. Erving Goffman's work on stigma (1963) is revisited, & it is argued that stigmatizing even very harmful health behavior (e.g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2008-08, Vol.67 (3), p.473-475 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Comments are offered on Ronald Bayer's (2008) analysis of stigma & the ethics of public health, challenging his contention that stigma is a matter of degree. Erving Goffman's work on stigma (1963) is revisited, & it is argued that stigmatizing even very harmful health behavior (e.g., smoking) is a "losing public health practice.". References. K. Hyatt Stewart |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.020 |