BILAG-2004 index captures systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity better than SLEDAI-2000

Objective:To assess the reliability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2000 index in routine practice and its ability to capture disease activity as compared with the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index.Methods:Patients with systemic lupus erythematos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2008-06, Vol.67 (6), p.873-876
Hauptverfasser: Yee, C-S, Isenberg, D A, Prabu, A, Sokoll, K, Teh, L-S, Rahman, A, Bruce, I N, Griffiths, B, Akil, M, McHugh, N, D’Cruz, D, Khamashta, M A, Maddison, P, Zoma, A, Gordon, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective:To assess the reliability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2000 index in routine practice and its ability to capture disease activity as compared with the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index.Methods:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from 11 centres were assessed separately by two raters in routine practice. Disease activity was assessed using the BILAG-2004 and SLEDAI-2000 indices. The level of agreement for items was used to assess the reliability of SLEDAI-2000. The ability to detect disease activity was assessed by determining the number of patients with a high activity on BILAG-2004 (overall score A or B) but low SLEDAI-2000 score (
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2007.070847