Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion

Abstract The accurate measurement of the in vivo knee joint kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) remains a challenge in biomedical engineering. We have adapted a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to investigate the various in vivo dynamic knee joint motions. This paper presents a thorou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2008-01, Vol.41 (7), p.1616-1622
Hauptverfasser: Li, Guoan, Van de Velde, Samuel K, Bingham, Jeffrey T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The accurate measurement of the in vivo knee joint kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) remains a challenge in biomedical engineering. We have adapted a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to investigate the various in vivo dynamic knee joint motions. This paper presents a thorough validation of the accuracy and repeatability of the DFIS system when used to measure 6DOF dynamic knee kinematics. First, the validation utilized standard geometric spheres made from different materials to demonstrate the capability of the DFIS technique to determine the object positions under changing speeds. The translational pose of the spheres could be recreated to less than 0.15±0.09 mm for velocities below 300 mm/s. Next, tantalum beads were inserted into the femur and tibia of two fresh frozen cadaver knees to compare the dynamic kinematics measured by matching knee models to the kinematics from the tantalum bead matching—a technique similar to Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Each cadaveric knee was attached to the crosshead of a tensile testing machine and vertically translated at a rate of 16.66 mm/s while images were captured with the DFIS. Subsequently, the tibia was held fixed and the femur manually flexed from full extension to 90° of flexion, as the DFIS acquired images. In vitro translation of the cadaver knee using the tensile testing machine deviated from predicted values by 0.08±0.14 mm for the matched knee models. The difference between matching the knee and tantalum bead models during the dynamic flexion–extension motion of the knee was 0.1±0.65°/s in flexion speed; 0.24±0.16 mm in posterior femoral translation; and 0.16±0.61° in internal–external tibial rotation. Finally, we applied the method to investigate the knee kinematics of a living subject during a step ascent and treadmill gait. High repeatability was demonstrated for the in vivo application. Thus, the DFIS provides an easy and powerful tool for accurately determining 6DOF positions of the knee when performing daily functional activities.
ISSN:0021-9290
1873-2380
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.034