Comparable three months' outcome of total arterial revascularization versus conventional coronary surgery: Copenhagen Arterial Revascularization Randomized Patency and Outcome trial

Objective The in-hospital safety of total arterial revascularization for coronary artery bypass surgery seems to be comparable to conventional revascularization, but randomized trials evaluating this are few and data on complications in the postoperative months are sparse. Methods In a randomized si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2008-05, Vol.135 (5), p.1069-1075
Hauptverfasser: Damgaard, Sune, MD, Lund, Jens T., MD, Lilleør, Nikolaj B., RN, Perko, Mario J., MD, DMSc, Sander, Kåre, MD, DMSc, Dimo, Blagoja, MD, Jensen, Maiken B., MD, Madsen, Jan K., MD, DMSc, Kelbæk, Henning, MD, DMSc, Steinbrüchel, Daniel A., MD, DMSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The in-hospital safety of total arterial revascularization for coronary artery bypass surgery seems to be comparable to conventional revascularization, but randomized trials evaluating this are few and data on complications in the postoperative months are sparse. Methods In a randomized single-center trial, 331 patients underwent total arterial revascularization using single or bilateral internal thoracic and radial arteries versus conventional revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts. We report the results from 3 months' follow-up. Results The mean age of patients was 59 ± 8 years, and 39 were women (12%). The median EuroSCORE was 2 (interquartile range 1–4). The arterial group comprised 161 patients, and the conventional group comprised 170 patients. The mean number of bypasses in the arterial group was 2.9 ± 0.9 versus 3.2 ± 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = .004). Three months' follow-up for the arterial versus conventional groups showed the following: deaths: 1 (0.6%) versus 0; stroke: 3 (1.9%) versus 3 (1.8%); myocardial infarction: 6 (3.7%) versus 4 (2.4%); sternal wound reoperation: 4 (2.5%) versus 0 ( P = .054); arm and leg wound complications requiring hospitalization: 3 (1.9%) versus 6 (3.5%) ( P = .50), respectively. Conclusion These results confirm previous reports that total arterial revascularization can be performed with low in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Further, in the 3 postoperative months, total arterial revascularization did not lead to more complications or admissions than conventional surgery. Arterial grafting was performed with significantly fewer bypasses, but no differences in anginal status were seen after 3 months. A tendency toward more sternal complications after arterial grafting was observed, but clinical outcomes were comparable to conventional grafting.
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.039