Sacral Nerve Stimulation is more Effective than Optimal Medical Therapy for Severe Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized, Controlled Study
Purpose This randomized study was designed to compare the effect of sacral neuromodulation with optimal medical therapy in patients with severe fecal incontinence. Methods Patients (aged 39–86 years) with severe fecal incontinence were randomized to have sacral nerve stimulation (SNS group; n = 60)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2008-05, Vol.51 (5), p.494-502 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This randomized study was designed to compare the effect of sacral neuromodulation with optimal medical therapy in patients with severe fecal incontinence.
Methods
Patients (aged 39–86 years) with severe fecal incontinence were randomized to have sacral nerve stimulation (SNS group; n = 60) or best supportive therapy (control; n = 60), which consisted of pelvic floor exercises, bulking agent, and dietary manipulation. Full assessment included endoanal ultrasound, anorectal physiology, two-week bowel diary, and fecal incontinence quality of life index. The follow-up duration was 12 months.
Results
The sacral nerve stimulation group was similar to the control group with regard to gender (F:M = 11:1
vs.
14:1) and age (mean, 63.9
vs.
63 years). The incidence of a defect of ≤ 120° of the external anal sphincter and pudendal neuropathy was similar between the groups. Trial screening improved incontinent episodes by more than 50 percent in 54 patients (90 percent). Full-stage sacral nerve stimulation was performed in 53 of these 54 “successful” patients. There were no septic complications. With sacral nerve stimulation, mean incontinent episodes per week decreased from 9.5 to 3.1 (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3706 1530-0358 0329-0883 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10350-007-9103-5 |