Fluoride release and re-uptake in direct tooth colored restorative materials
Objectives. Glass ionomers may be “recharged” through topical fluoride (F −) treatments; however, this reported “recharging,” may be attributed to surface changes after F − treatment. This study examined differences in F − release and re-uptake among dual-cured and chemically-cured glass ionomers, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 1998-03, Vol.14 (2), p.129-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives. Glass ionomers may be “recharged” through topical fluoride (F
−) treatments; however, this reported “recharging,” may be attributed to surface changes after F
− treatment. This study examined differences in F
− release and re-uptake among dual-cured and chemically-cured glass ionomers, and a photo-cured F
− releasing composite. A secondary goal was to determine if tensile strength or surface roughness changed due to F
− release, or F
− re-uptake and re-release.
Methods. In Phase 1, initial surface roughness and diametral tensile strength were measured. F
− release was measured for 30 days. Strength and roughness were then remeasured. In Phase 2, surface roughness was measured, then materials were treated with a 5000
ppm neutral F
− gel, the same gel without F
−, or phosphoric acid. F
− release was measured for 30 days, then final surface roughness and strength were determined.
Results. Significant differences were found in amount and rate of F
− release, and F
− re-uptake and re-release among study materials and enamel controls (
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00019-0 |