The Reliability and Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract Meachen S-J, Hanks RA, Millis SR, Rapport LJ. The reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 in persons with traumatic brain injury. Objective To investigate the psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 (BSI-18) among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2008-05, Vol.89 (5), p.958-965
Hauptverfasser: Meachen, Sarah-Jane, MA, Hanks, Robin A., PhD, Millis, Scott R., PhD, Rapport, Lisa J., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Meachen S-J, Hanks RA, Millis SR, Rapport LJ. The reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 in persons with traumatic brain injury. Objective To investigate the psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 (BSI-18) among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design Inception cohort design with cross-sectional follow-up of 6 months to 15 years. Setting Rehabilitation hospital. Participants Adults (N=257) with moderate to severe TBI (81 inpatients and 176 follow-up participants, analyzed separately). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The BSI-18 is a brief screen of psychologic distress with a Global Severity Index (GSI), and 3 clinical subscales: somatization, anxiety, and depression. Results Internal consistency of the GSI was high in both follow-up participants (α=.91) and inpatients (α=.84), whereas estimates for the somatization, anxiety, and depression subscales were more variable (α range, .61–.84). As would be expected for a measure of affective state, retest reliability estimates were only moderate. The BSI-18 GSI correlated with multiple measures of psychosocial adjustment. After accounting for demographics, injury severity, inpatient functional status, years since injury, and various psychosocial factors, the BSI-18 showed incremental validity in predicting concurrent functional, psychosocial, and psychologic status. Conclusions The BSI-18 GSI had excellent reliability and validity among inpatients and follow-up participants. Modest reliability estimates may place an upper bound on the validity of the BSI-18 clinical subscales in inpatient TBI populations.
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.028