Cost-effective management of gynecomastia

Background: Routine endocrine screening of idiopathic gynecomastia has been advocated, but may not be cost effective. We carried out a cost-benefit analysis of this approach. Methods: A retrospective study (1992 to 1997) of 87 adult males with symptomatic gynecomastia was performed. Results: Thirty-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1998-12, Vol.176 (6), p.638-641
Hauptverfasser: Bowers, Steven P, Pearlman, Nathan W, McIntyre, Robert C, Finlayson, Christina A, Huerd, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Routine endocrine screening of idiopathic gynecomastia has been advocated, but may not be cost effective. We carried out a cost-benefit analysis of this approach. Methods: A retrospective study (1992 to 1997) of 87 adult males with symptomatic gynecomastia was performed. Results: Thirty-four (39%) patients had extrinsic causes; 53 (61%) were considered idiopathic. Forty-five idiopathic cases underwent endocrine testing: β human chorionic gonadotropin alone, 16; and β human chorionic gonadotropin, LH, estradiol, testosterone ± testicular ultrasound, 29. One (2%) occult Leydig cell testicular tumor was detected. Forty-four patients had normal studies and remain well after local excision. Conclusion: Routine endocrine evaluation of idiopathic gynecomastia is rarely productive; such testing is best done selectively.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00281-5