Cost-effective management of gynecomastia
Background: Routine endocrine screening of idiopathic gynecomastia has been advocated, but may not be cost effective. We carried out a cost-benefit analysis of this approach. Methods: A retrospective study (1992 to 1997) of 87 adult males with symptomatic gynecomastia was performed. Results: Thirty-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1998-12, Vol.176 (6), p.638-641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Routine endocrine screening of idiopathic gynecomastia has been advocated, but may not be cost effective. We carried out a cost-benefit analysis of this approach.
Methods: A retrospective study (1992 to 1997) of 87 adult males with symptomatic gynecomastia was performed.
Results: Thirty-four (39%) patients had extrinsic causes; 53 (61%) were considered idiopathic. Forty-five idiopathic cases underwent endocrine testing: β human chorionic gonadotropin alone, 16; and β human chorionic gonadotropin, LH, estradiol, testosterone ± testicular ultrasound, 29. One (2%) occult Leydig cell testicular tumor was detected. Forty-four patients had normal studies and remain well after local excision.
Conclusion: Routine endocrine evaluation of idiopathic gynecomastia is rarely productive; such testing is best done selectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00281-5 |