Can clinical colour vision tests be used to predict the results of the Farnsworth lantern test?
Clinicians usually do not have access to a lantern test when making an occupational assessment of the ability of a person with defective colour vision to recognise signal light colours: they must rely on the results of ordinary clinical tests. While all colour vision defectives fail the Holmes Wrigh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vision research (Oxford) 1998-11, Vol.38 (21), p.3483-3485 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clinicians usually do not have access to a lantern test when making an occupational assessment of the ability of a person with defective colour vision to recognise signal light colours: they must rely on the results of ordinary clinical tests. While all colour vision defectives fail the Holmes Wright Type
B lantern test and most fail the Holmes Wright Type
A lantern, 35% of colour vision defectives pass the Farnsworth lantern. Can clinical tests predict who will pass and fail the Farnsworth lantern? We find that a pass (less than two or more diametrical crossings) at the Farnsworth Panel D
15 Dichotomous test has a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.94 in predicting a pass or fail at the Farnsworth lantern test; a Nagel range of >10 has a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.57. We conclude that neither the D
15 nor the Nagel Anomaloscope matching range are satisfactory predictors of performance on the Farnsworth Lantern. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-6989 1878-5646 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00119-9 |