A double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class-II furcation involvements

Objective: The aim of the present randomized, double‐blind study was to evaluate the clinical response of proximal furcations treated with enamel matrix derivative proteins (EMD). Material and Methods: Fifteen patients, each with a pair of contralateral class‐II proximal furcation involvements, pres...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2008-05, Vol.35 (5), p.429-437
Hauptverfasser: Casarin, Renato Corrêa Viana, Del Peloso Ribeiro, Érica, Nociti Jr, Francisco Humberto, Sallum, Antônio Wilson, Sallum, Enilson Antônio, Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi, Casati, Márcio Zaffalon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The aim of the present randomized, double‐blind study was to evaluate the clinical response of proximal furcations treated with enamel matrix derivative proteins (EMD). Material and Methods: Fifteen patients, each with a pair of contralateral class‐II proximal furcation involvements, presenting probing depths (PDs) 5 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP) were selected. The patients were randomly assigned to: control group (n=15) – open flap debridement (OFD)+24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) conditioning; test group (n=15) – OFD+24% EDTA conditioning+EMD application. Plaque index (PI), BOP, PD, gingival margin position (GMP), relative vertical and horizontal clinical attachment level (RVCAL and RHCAL), vertical and horizontal bone level (VBL and HBL) and furcation closure were evaluated immediately before and 2, 4 and 6 months after the surgeries. Results: At 6 months, the RVCAL gains of the control and test group were 0.39 ± 1.00 and 0.54 ± 0.95 mm, while the RHCAL gains were 1.21 ± 2.28 and 1.36 ± 1.26 mm (p>0.05). The VBL and HBL gains of the control group were 1.04 ± 1.12 and 1.00 ± 1.79 mm, and 0.82 ± 1.82 and 1.17 ± 1.38 mm for the test group (p>0.05). In addition, a statistical difference was observed in the number of the remaining class‐II furcations between the test and control groups (p
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01202.x