A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients
Background. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Group has published a consensus definition/classification system for acute kidney injury (AKI) termed the RIFLE criteria. The Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) group has recently proposed modifications to this system. It is currently unknown whether...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2008-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1569-1574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Group has published a consensus definition/classification system for acute kidney injury (AKI) termed the RIFLE criteria. The Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) group has recently proposed modifications to this system. It is currently unknown whether there are advantages between these criteria. Methods. We interrogated the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database (APD) for all adult admissions to 57 ICUs from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005. We compared the performance of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for diagnosis and classification of AKI and for robustness of hospital mortality. Results. We included 120 123 critically ill patients, of which 27.8% had a primary diagnosis of sepsis. We found only small differences ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ndt/gfn009 |