Induced Cell Trauma During in Vitro Perfusion: A Comparison Between Two Different Perfusion Systems

The purpose of this study was to compare blood cell activation during in vitro long‐term perfusion using 2 parallel in vitro extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems. We compared two substantially different perfusion systems, an assistance respiratoire extra corporelle (AREC) system on one hand, containing an AREC pump, silicon tubing, and a hollow‐fiber oxygenator, and a centrifugal pump system, on the other hand, containing a Biomedicus centrifugal pump, PVC tubing, and a membrane oxygenator. We measured the platelet count using an automated blood cell counter. Platelet activation was evaluated using a flow cytometric technique for the platelet membrane expression of glycoproteins and ELISA for the plasma concentration of β‐thromboglobulin (β‐TG), a platelet specific protein released into the blood upon platelet activation. The neutrophil count was assayed using an automated blood cell counter and the plasma concentration of cytokines using an ELISA kit. A significant difference between the two systems was observed in terms of the platelet membrane expression of glycoprotein (GP)Ib (p = 0. 0001) and GPIIb/IIIa (p = 0.0037), indicating a lower degree of platelet activation in the AREC system. The concentration of neutrophils was significantly lower in the centrifugal system (p = 0.002) compared to the AREC system. The neutrophil membrane expression of CD11b was significantly lower (p = 0.0067) in the AREC system, indicating a lower degree of neutrophil activation compared to the centrifugal pump system. A significantly lower degree of hemolysis, as expressed by plasma hemoglobin, was observed in the AREC pump system (p = 0.0491). In conclusion, lower degrees of the platelet membrane expression of GPIb and GPIIb/IIIa and of the neutrophil membrane expression of CD11b were observed in the AREC system, indicating a lower degree of platelet and neutrophil activation in this system. No significant difference between the two systems as to the plasma concentration of interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, or IL‐8 could be recorded. Further studies are warranted to specify the role of each individual component of the two systems.