Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule‐out criteria

Backgound: Over‐investigation of low‐risk patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a growing problem. The combination of gestalt estimate of low suspicion for PE, together with the PE rule‐out criteria [PERC(−): age

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2008-05, Vol.6 (5), p.772-780
Hauptverfasser:	KLINE, J. A., COURTNEY, D. M., KABRHEL, C., MOORE, C. L., SMITHLINE, H. A, PLEWA, M. C., RICHMAN, P. B., O'NEIL, B. J., NORDENHOLZ, K.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Algorithms computerized tomography angiography decision rule decision‐making diagnosis Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - standards Diagnosis, Differential D‐dimer False Negative Reactions Humans medical malpractice Probability Prospective Studies pulmonary embolism Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Venous Thromboembolism
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Backgound: Over‐investigation of low‐risk patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a growing problem. The combination of gestalt estimate of low suspicion for PE, together with the PE rule‐out criteria [PERC(−): age
ISSN:	1538-7933 1538-7836 1538-7836
DOI:	10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02944.x