ETIOPATHOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED TO HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATED WITH VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA

Abstract OBJECTIVE We retrospectively analyzed various clinical factors to determine whether or not these factors are etiopathologically related to the development of hydrocephalus in patients with vestibular schwannomas. METHODS There were 68 patients (29 men, 39 women) in this study who underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgery 2007-12, Vol.61 (6), p.1186-1193
Hauptverfasser: Fukuda, Masafumi, Oishi, Makoto, Kawaguchi, Tadashi, Watanabe, Masatoshi, Takao, Tetsuro, Tanaka, Ryuichi, Fujii, Yukihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract OBJECTIVE We retrospectively analyzed various clinical factors to determine whether or not these factors are etiopathologically related to the development of hydrocephalus in patients with vestibular schwannomas. METHODS There were 68 patients (29 men, 39 women) in this study who underwent resection of a vestibular schwannoma. The age at the time of surgery ranged from 19 to 76 years (mean age, 51.4 yr). The maximum diameter of the tumor in the cerebellopontine cistern ranged from 0 (localized within the internal auditory canal) to 56 mm (mean, 32.0 ± 12.9 mm). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein concentration in the cerebellomedullary cistern was measured intraoperatively in all patients. RESULTS Sixteen (23.5%) of the 68 patients exhibited radiographic evidence of hydrocephalus. Univariate analysis of various factors revealed that both tumor size and CSF protein concentration were positively related to development of hydrocephalus (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). However, in multiple logistic regression analysis, only the CSF protein concentration was predictive for development of hydrocephalus (P = 0.022). There was a trend toward increased CSF protein concentration in patients with a large tumor (≥40 mm) compared with those with a small tumor (
ISSN:0148-396X
1524-4040
DOI:10.1227/01.neu.0000306096.61012.22