Geriatric Care Management for Low-Income Seniors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
CONTEXT Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. OBJECTIVES To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. DES...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2007-12, Vol.298 (22), p.2623-2633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. OBJECTIVES To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Controlled clinical trial of 951 adults 65 years or older with an annual income less than 200% of the federal poverty level, whose primary care physicians were randomized from January 2002 through August 2004 to participate in the intervention (474 patients) or usual care (477 patients) in community-based health centers. INTERVENTION Patients received 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) scales and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visits not resulting in hospitalization and hospitalizations. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements for intervention patients compared with usual care at 24 months in 4 of 8 SF-36 scales: general health (0.2 vs −2.3, P = .045), vitality (2.6 vs −2.6, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.298.22.2623 |