Performance of clinician versus self-report measures to identify obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents

The aim of this study was to study agreement between clinician-rated measures and self-report measures previously used in epidemiologic studies to identify obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in youth and to determine the adequacy of self-report measures as screening instruments. Leyton Obsessional...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology 2005-12, Vol.15 (6), p.956-963
Hauptverfasser: Stewart, S Evelyn, Ceranoglu, T Atilla, O'Hanley, Tara, Geller, Daniel A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to study agreement between clinician-rated measures and self-report measures previously used in epidemiologic studies to identify obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in youth and to determine the adequacy of self-report measures as screening instruments. Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version (LOI-CV) survey form self-report and Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) clinician-report measures were compared in a sample of 81 OCD-affected youths diagnosed using structured diagnostic interviews and the best-estimate method. Sensitivities and agreement between tests are determined for different cutoff scores. The LOI-CV survey form total (item+interference) score is correlated with KSADS-E OCD severity (r=0.37, p=0.001) but not clinician-rated GAF scores (r=-0.18, p=0.12). LOI-CV survey form sensitivities at cutoff scores of 15, 20, 25, and 30 are 55%, 36%, 28%, and 19%, respectively. CY-BOCS scores are correlated with subject-rated interview severity (p
ISSN:1044-5463
1557-8992
DOI:10.1089/cap.2005.15.956