Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period

Abstract Introduction Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax® ) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H® ). Results During first mont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2007-03, Vol.39 (3), p.253-256
Hauptverfasser: Lauro, A, Amaduzzi, A, Dazzi, A, Ercolani, G, Zanfi, C, Golfieri, L, Grazi, G.L, Vivarelli, M, Cescon, M, Varotti, G, Del Gaudio, M, Ravaioli, M, Siniscalchi, A, Faenza, S, D’Errico, A, Di Simone, M, Pironi, L, Pinna, A.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax® ) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H® ). Results During first month, 45% of Daclizumab recipients experienced six acute cellular rejections (ACRs) of mild degree, while 63% of them developed an infection requiring treatment. We found three acute cellular rejections in 17.6% of Alemtuzumab recipients, two with moderate degree; 64.7% of them required treatment for infection. Discussion and conclusions Graft and patient 3-years cumulative survival rate were not significantly different between groups. Alemtuzumab seems to offer a better immunosuppression during first month.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.012