Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as induction agents in adult intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: A comparison of two different regimens on 29 recipients during the early post-operative period
Abstract Introduction Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax® ) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H® ). Results During first mont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive and liver disease 2007-03, Vol.39 (3), p.253-256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Introduction Induction therapy has been recently adopted for intestinal transplant. Patients and methods We compared during first 30 days post-transplantation 29 recipients, allocated in two groups, treated with Daclizumab (Zenapax® ) or Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H® ). Results During first month, 45% of Daclizumab recipients experienced six acute cellular rejections (ACRs) of mild degree, while 63% of them developed an infection requiring treatment. We found three acute cellular rejections in 17.6% of Alemtuzumab recipients, two with moderate degree; 64.7% of them required treatment for infection. Discussion and conclusions Graft and patient 3-years cumulative survival rate were not significantly different between groups. Alemtuzumab seems to offer a better immunosuppression during first month. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1590-8658 1878-3562 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.012 |