Survival rate of self-tapping implants for bone-anchored hearing aids
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new self-tapping implant for a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) had the same high frequency of osseointegration as previous implants requiring pre-tapping. Method: Over a three-year period, 144 consecutive implants were placed in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of laryngology and otology 2007-02, Vol.121 (2), p.101-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new self-tapping implant for a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) had the same high frequency of osseointegration as previous implants requiring pre-tapping. Method: Over a three-year period, 144 consecutive implants were placed in the mastoid for BAHA and evaluated. Results: Two implants were lost; both were of the self-tapping type. One was in an 11-year-old boy, who lost his implant six weeks after surgery when the BAHA was fitted. The other was in an elderly man, a heavy smoker with diabetes. Using Fisher's exact test, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.30). Conclusion: Self-tapping implants facilitate surgery and shorten operating time. Over a short follow up, we did not find any significant difference; however, it is important to follow these implants over a longer time period. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-2151 1748-5460 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S002221510600243X |