Dolasetron versus ondansetron as single-agent prophylaxis for patients at increased risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial

This study identified 100 ambulatory surgery patients receiving general anesthesia who were at increased risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and randomly assigned them to receive single-agent prophylaxis (12.5 mg of dolasetron or 4 mg of ondansetron) 15 to 30 minutes before the end of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2006-09, Vol.171 (9), p.913-916
Hauptverfasser: Birmingham, Sean D, Mecklenburg, Brian W, Lujan, Eugenio, Dacanay, Rhodel G, Boyle, Patrick K, Green, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study identified 100 ambulatory surgery patients receiving general anesthesia who were at increased risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and randomly assigned them to receive single-agent prophylaxis (12.5 mg of dolasetron or 4 mg of ondansetron) 15 to 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Data were collected in the postanesthesia care unit, and patients completed a questionnaire 24 hours after surgery. No statistically significant difference existed between study groups in demographic features, history of PONV, history of motion sickness, or type and duration of surgery and anesthesia. No statistically significant difference existed in satisfaction with the medication used for PONV prophylaxis (dolasetron, 70.9 of 100 mm; ondansetron, 67.9 of 100 mm; p = 0.69). No statistically significant difference existed in satisfaction with the overall surgical experience (dolasetron, 87.9 of 100 mm; ondansetron, 85.3 of 100 mm; p = 0.36). Costminimization strategies should be considered without fear of substandard care or increased patient dissatisfaction.
ISSN:0026-4075
1930-613X
DOI:10.7205/MILMED.171.9.913