Sonohysterography versus transvaginal sonography for screening of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) with transvaginal sonography (TVS) for the screening of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in out-patients. Methods 81 patients with AUB were studied. All cases who were examined with TVS, were further inve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2007-01, Vol.96 (1), p.20-23
Hauptverfasser: Alborzi, S., Parsanezhad, M.E., Mahmoodian, N., Alborzi, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) with transvaginal sonography (TVS) for the screening of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in out-patients. Methods 81 patients with AUB were studied. All cases who were examined with TVS, were further investigated with SIS using saline as contrast medium, finally hysteroscopy was used as the gold standard. Results TVS had sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 92%, positive predictive value of 94% and negative predictive value of 65%, while SIS had sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 96% and negative predictive value of 90%. TVS had kappa measure of agreement of 0.60 while 0.86 was reported for SIS. Conclusions In this study SIS was more sensitive and specific in diagnosing polyp, myoma and adenomyosis with high positive and negative predictive value. Furthermore, results obtained by SIS demonstrate more agreement with that obtained by hysteroscopy than TVS.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.004