Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia

Patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia (fv‐FTD) exhibit deficits of executive functions. However, no single executive function task that might be used to detect the executive function deficits in fv‐FTD patients has been established as yet. The frontal assessment battery (FAB)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences 2007-02, Vol.61 (1), p.78-83
Hauptverfasser: NAKAAKI, SHUTARO, MURATA, YOSHIE, SATO, JUNKO, SHINAGAWA, YOSHIHIRO, MATSUI, TERUO, TATSUMI, HIROSHI, FURUKAWA, TOSHI A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia (fv‐FTD) exhibit deficits of executive functions. However, no single executive function task that might be used to detect the executive function deficits in fv‐FTD patients has been established as yet. The frontal assessment battery (FAB) devised by Dubois et al. (2000) has been reported to be a quick and simple bedside screening test that is sensitive for differentiating between FTD and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The present study was conducted with the aim of ascertaining the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the FAB among Japanese patients with fv‐FTD. The Japanese version of FAB was given to patients with mild fv‐FTD (n = 18) and those with AD (n = 18). The test–retest reliability was evaluated after a 3‐week interval by the same interviewer. Data from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Keio version: KWCST) were also collected to ascertain the validity of the FAB. The Japanese version of the FAB exhibited good internal reliability (Cronbach’s α: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50–0.84) and good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.89, 95%CI = 0.77–0.95). Significant correlations were observed between the total FAB score and the category achieved (r = 0.454, P 
ISSN:1323-1316
1440-1819
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01614.x