Retail alcohol monopolies, underage drinking, and youth impaired driving deaths
To explore associations of state retail alcohol monopolies with underage drinking and alcohol-impaired driving deaths. Surveys on youth who drank alcohol and binge-drank recently and their beverage choices; census of motor vehicle fatalities by driver blood alcohol level. Regressions estimated assoc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accident analysis and prevention 2006-11, Vol.38 (6), p.1162-1167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To explore associations of state retail alcohol monopolies with underage drinking and alcohol-impaired driving deaths.
Surveys on youth who drank alcohol and binge-drank recently and their beverage choices; census of motor vehicle fatalities by driver blood alcohol level.
Regressions estimated associations of monopolies with under-21 drinking, binge drinking, alcohol-impaired driving deaths, and odds a driver under 21 who died was alcohol-positive.
About 93.8% of those ages 12–20 who consumed alcohol in the past month drank some wine or spirits. In states with a retail monopoly over spirits or wine and spirits, an average of 14.5% fewer high school students reported drinking alcohol in the past 30 days and 16.7% fewer reported binge drinking in the past 30 days than high school students in non-monopoly states. Monopolies over both wine and spirits were associated with larger consumption reductions than monopolies over spirits only. Lower consumption rates in monopoly states, in turn, were associated with a 9.3% lower alcohol-impaired driving death rate under age 21 in monopoly states versus non-monopoly states. Alcohol monopolies may prevent 45 impaired driving deaths annually.
Continuing existing retail alcohol monopolies should help control underage drinking and associated harms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4575 1879-2057 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aap.2006.05.003 |