Colonic response to food in constipation

Colonic response to food is possibly abnormal in constipation. The colonic response to food was evaluated in 323 patients and 60 healthy subjects by following the movements of radiopaque markers after ingestion of a standard 1,000-cal test meal. Constipated patients were divided into four groups: on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of colorectal disease 2006-12, Vol.21 (8), p.826-833
Hauptverfasser: BOUCHOUCHA, Michel, DEVROEDE, Ghislain, FAYE, Alain, LE TOUMELIN, Philippe, ARHAN, Pierre, ARSAC, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Colonic response to food is possibly abnormal in constipation. The colonic response to food was evaluated in 323 patients and 60 healthy subjects by following the movements of radiopaque markers after ingestion of a standard 1,000-cal test meal. Constipated patients were divided into four groups: one with a normal, and three with a delayed colorectal transit time. When the delay was found mainly in the ascending colon, the group was labeled as suffering from "colonic inertia". In "hindgut dysfunction", the delay was predominantly found in the descending colon, whereas the term "outlet obstruction" was reserved for constipated patients whose major site of delay was the rectosigmoid area. Colonic response to food was quantified by evaluating the variation of markers in a given abdominal region and the evolution of the geometric center on the entire plain film of the abdomen. Emptying of the caecum-ascending colon and filling of the rectosigmoid area characterize the colonic response to food in healthy subjects. Constipated patients also filled the rectosigmoid, but different patterns were found in the colon. In constipated patients with transit in the normal range, there was a frequent (41%) absence of colonic response to food as compared to controls (13%) and constipated patients with delayed transit (p
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-005-0787-5