Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2

Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2005-11, Vol.66 (6), p.445-454
Hauptverfasser: Lisson, Jörg A, Pyka, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 454
container_issue 6
container_start_page 445
container_title Journal of orofacial orthopedics
container_volume 66
creator Lisson, Jörg A
Pyka, Christian
description Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.01) and females (p < 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p < 0.05).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00056-005-0515-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68873554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68873554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1445-fa0f69f5bdfbd3834bc22a081a66e1a959cabe532f62065e6ba89c1e0767296a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMtKw0AUHUSxtfoBbmRWrozOZB5JltL6KBQE0fVwk9yU0Tzq3Fbw753Qgrg593DPY3EYu5TiVgqR3ZEQwtgkQiKMNIk6YlNpI7GZ1MeRa6UTkxZqws6IPka3FvaUTaRVShptpux1gVsMne99v-b0iS1uoeUbCNCNAnHfc-jXLfKqBSIkvlze8Np_e_JDz2UU6_-v9JydNNASXhzujL0_PrzNn5PVy9Nyfr9KKqm1SRoQjS0aU9ZNWatc6bJKUxC5BGtRQmGKCko0Km1sKqxBW0JeVBJFZrO0sKBm7HrfuwnD1w5p6zpPFbYt9DjsyNk8z5QxOhrl3liFgShg4zbBdxB-nBRuHNLth3QR3DikUzFzdSjflR3Wf4nDcuoX9kVs9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68873554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lisson, Jörg A ; Pyka, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Lisson, Jörg A ; Pyka, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.01) and females (p &lt; 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.001) and females (p &lt; 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p &lt; 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-5293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00056-005-0515-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16331545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Dentistry ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - diagnosis ; Odontometry - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2005-11, Vol.66 (6), p.445-454</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1445-fa0f69f5bdfbd3834bc22a081a66e1a959cabe532f62065e6ba89c1e0767296a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16331545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lisson, Jörg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyka, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.01) and females (p &lt; 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.001) and females (p &lt; 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p &lt; 0.05).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - diagnosis</subject><subject>Odontometry - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1434-5293</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMtKw0AUHUSxtfoBbmRWrozOZB5JltL6KBQE0fVwk9yU0Tzq3Fbw753Qgrg593DPY3EYu5TiVgqR3ZEQwtgkQiKMNIk6YlNpI7GZ1MeRa6UTkxZqws6IPka3FvaUTaRVShptpux1gVsMne99v-b0iS1uoeUbCNCNAnHfc-jXLfKqBSIkvlze8Np_e_JDz2UU6_-v9JydNNASXhzujL0_PrzNn5PVy9Nyfr9KKqm1SRoQjS0aU9ZNWatc6bJKUxC5BGtRQmGKCko0Km1sKqxBW0JeVBJFZrO0sKBm7HrfuwnD1w5p6zpPFbYt9DjsyNk8z5QxOhrl3liFgShg4zbBdxB-nBRuHNLth3QR3DikUzFzdSjflR3Wf4nDcuoX9kVs9A</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Lisson, Jörg A</creator><creator>Pyka, Christian</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2</title><author>Lisson, Jörg A ; Pyka, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1445-fa0f69f5bdfbd3834bc22a081a66e1a959cabe532f62065e6ba89c1e0767296a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - diagnosis</topic><topic>Odontometry - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lisson, Jörg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyka, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lisson, Jörg A</au><au>Pyka, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>445-454</pages><issn>1434-5293</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.01) and females (p &lt; 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p &lt; 0.001) and females (p &lt; 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p &lt; 0.05).</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>16331545</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00056-005-0515-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-5293
ispartof Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2005-11, Vol.66 (6), p.445-454
issn 1434-5293
1615-6714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68873554
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Child
Dentistry
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class II - diagnosis
Odontometry - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20skeletal%20parameters%20in%20angle%20classes%20II,%20division%201%20and%20II,%20division%202&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Lisson,%20J%C3%B6rg%20A&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=445-454&rft.issn=1434-5293&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00056-005-0515-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68873554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68873554&rft_id=info:pmid/16331545&rfr_iscdi=true