Determining skeletal parameters in angle classes II, division 1 and II, division 2
Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2. Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2005-11, Vol.66 (6), p.445-454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim of the study was to find out whether significant differences in skeletal morphology exist between Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2.
Fifty-nine patients without previous orthodontic treatment showing Class II occlusion and distobasal jaw relation were evaluated by cephalometric analysis.
Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.01) and females (p < 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p < 0.05). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-5293 1615-6714 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00056-005-0515-3 |