Endoscopic sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis in high‐risk surgical patients: a decision analysis

Summary Background  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for patients with choledocholithiasis after ERCP with sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction. Aim  We designed a decision model to address whether ES alone versus ES followed by LC (ES + LC) is the optimal treatment in high‐risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2006-10, Vol.24 (7), p.1059-1066
Hauptverfasser: SIDDIQUI, A. A., MITROO, P., KOWALSKI, T., LOREN, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for patients with choledocholithiasis after ERCP with sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction. Aim  We designed a decision model to address whether ES alone versus ES followed by LC (ES + LC) is the optimal treatment in high‐risk patients with choledocholithiasis. Methods  Our cohort were patients with obstructive jaundice who have undergone an ES with biliary clearance. Recurrent biliary complications over a 2‐year period stratified by gallbladder status (in/out) and age‐stratified surgical complication rates were obtained from the literature. Failure of therapy was defined as either recurrent symptoms or death attributed to biliary complications. Results  For age 70–79 years, ES failed in 15% whereas ES + LC failed in 17% of cases. Mortality in the EC + LC group was 3.4 times that of the ES alone cohort. For age 80+ years, ES was dominant with an incremental success rate of 8%. Mortality in the ES + LC was 7.6 times that of ES. For age
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03103.x