Fluoropolymer-coated Dacron Versus PTFE Grafts for Femorofemoral Crossover Bypass: Randomised Trial

To investigate whether patency of a thin walled 8 mm fluoropassivated Dacron graft was similar to that of a standard 8 mm PTFE graft for femorofemoral crossover bypass surgery. A randomised multicentre clinical trial comparing two vascular grafts with participation of 10 departments of vascular surg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2006-10, Vol.32 (4), p.431-438
Hauptverfasser: Eiberg, J.P., Røder, O., Stahl-Madsen, M., Eldrup, N., Qvarfordt, P., Laursen, A., Greve, M., Flörenes, T., Nielsen, O.M., Seidelin, C., Vestergaard-Andersen, T., Schroeder, T.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate whether patency of a thin walled 8 mm fluoropassivated Dacron graft was similar to that of a standard 8 mm PTFE graft for femorofemoral crossover bypass surgery. A randomised multicentre clinical trial comparing two vascular grafts with participation of 10 departments of vascular surgery in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. 198 patients were randomised to PTFE ( n = 107) or fluoropolymer-coated Dacron grafts ( n = 91), 63% underwent surgery for claudication, 27% for ischaemic rest pain and 10% for tissue loss. The median follow-up time was 24 months (IQR 19–26 months). The primary patency rate of the two grafts was similar (log rank test: p = 0.35). The primary patency rates (95% CI) for coated Dacron and PTFE grafts were 92% (86–98) and 94% (89–99) at 12 months and 87% (74–95) and 93% (87–99) at 24 months, respectively. In patients with unilateral iliac artery disease not amenable to angioplasty, the femoral-femoral bypass is durable and effective. No difference in patency was found between the two graft materials (fluoropolymer coated Dacron and PTFE).
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.04.018