Integrating risk profiles for disease progression in the treatment choice for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia: a combined analysis of external evidence and clinical expertise

The RAND appropriateness method was used to explore the relevance of risk factors for disease progression in the treatment choice for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). A total of, 12 international experts assessed the appropriateness of various treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 2005-12, Vol.8 (4), p.369-374
Hauptverfasser: Speakman, M, Batista, J, Berges, R, Chartier-Kastler, E, Conti, G, Desgrandchamps, F, Dreikorn, K, Lowe, F, O'Leary, M, Perez, M, Trachtenberg, J, Tubaro, A, Meesen, B, Smets, L, Stoevelaar, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The RAND appropriateness method was used to explore the relevance of risk factors for disease progression in the treatment choice for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). A total of, 12 international experts assessed the appropriateness of various treatments for 243 risk profiles. Highest appropriateness rates were found for α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonists (68% of profiles) and combination therapy (46%). A large prostate volume was the dominant argument in favour of 5 α -reductase inhibitors and combination therapy, but was irrelevant for the choice of surgery. Considerable postvoid residual, severe symptoms and poor maximum flow rate were the most important factors in favour of surgery.
ISSN:1365-7852
1476-5608
DOI:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500827