VenaFlow Plus Lovenox vs VenaFlow Plus Aspirin for Thromboembolic Disease Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Two hundred seventy-five patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive spinal epidural anesthesia (SEA), a VenaFlow calf compression device, and enoxaparin (group A) or SEA, VenaFlow, and aspirin (group B). Aspirin was started on the day of surgery,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2006-09, Vol.21 (6), p.139-143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two hundred seventy-five patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive spinal epidural anesthesia (SEA), a VenaFlow calf compression device, and enoxaparin (group A) or SEA, VenaFlow, and aspirin (group B). Aspirin was started on the day of surgery, whereas enoxaparin was started 48 hours after surgery. Anticoagulants were continued for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients had an in-hospital ultrasound screening test on postoperative days 3 to 5 and a second follow-up ultrasound 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. The overall deep venous thrombosis rates in groups A and B were 14.1% and 17.8% (
P = not significant), respectively. When used in combination with pneumatic compression devices and SEA, enoxaparin was not superior to aspirin in preventing deep venous thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.017 |