Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy

To compare electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) with traditional suturing during vaginal hysterectomy. In a randomized controlled trial involving 68 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease, 37 procedures were performed using EBVS and 31 using traditional suturing. The end p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2005-12, Vol.91 (3), p.243-245
Hauptverfasser: Cronjé, H.S., de Coning, E.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) with traditional suturing during vaginal hysterectomy. In a randomized controlled trial involving 68 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease, 37 procedures were performed using EBVS and 31 using traditional suturing. The end points were procedure time, blood loss, number of ligatures used, postoperative pain score, and number of days in hospital. The procedure duration was shorter using EBVS (median duration, 32 vs. 40 min; P = .0003), with fewer ligatures (1 vs. 7; P < .0001) and less pain (median score, 4 vs. 6; P < .0001). There were no significant differences regarding blood loss (median, 100 vs. 160 mL; P = .36) and days in hospital (median, 2 vs. 2; P = .03). The EBVS system provided advantages over traditional suturing with regard to procedure time, number of ligatures used, and postoperative pain score.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.019