Clinical and histological healing pattern of peri-implantitis lesions following non-surgical treatment with an Er:YAG laser

Background and Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess clinical and histo‐pathological healing pattern of peri‐implantitis lesions following non‐surgical treatment with an Er:YAG laser (ERL). Study Design/Materials and Methods Twelve patients suffering from peri‐implantitis (n = 12 imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2006-08, Vol.38 (7), p.663-671
Hauptverfasser: Schwarz, Frank, Bieling, Katrin, Nuesry, Enaas, Sculean, Anton, Becker, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess clinical and histo‐pathological healing pattern of peri‐implantitis lesions following non‐surgical treatment with an Er:YAG laser (ERL). Study Design/Materials and Methods Twelve patients suffering from peri‐implantitis (n = 12 implants) received a single episode of non‐surgical instrumentation using ERL (12.7 J/cm2). Assessment of clinical parameters (plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth, gingival recession (GR), and clinical attachment level (CAL)), surgical defect examination, and histo‐pathological examination of peri‐implant tissue biopsies was performed after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months. Results All patients exhibited improvements of all clinical parameters investigated. However, histo‐pathological examination of tissue biopsies revealed a mixed chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate (macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells) which seemed to be encapsulated by deposition of irregular bundles of fibrous connective tissue showing increased proliferation of vascular structures. Conclusion It was concluded that a single course of non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using ERL may not be sufficient for the maintenance of failing implants. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.20347